Dancing queen

October 17, 2008 at 10:12 am (Clutch, Harem pants, Katie Holmes, Lace, Necklace, Shiny, Strapless) (, , , , , , )

I look at a lot of celebrity pictures. It’s kinda a hobby. Some make me swoon. Some make me laugh. Some make me shake my head in puzzlement. But very few make me really cringe. Cringe as in furrowed-brow-while-covering-my-eyes cringe.

This one made me cringe. What is it? Has wacky Katie Holmes gown to “fashion designing” again? I really just don’t get it. At all.

Now, I’m not a fan of jumpsuits. But I could see the white pants and strapless top combo as a jumpsuit. Retro seventies. Dancing queen. Harem pants. Not a favorite look, but one I could at least understand.

I have absolutely no clue how that seventies disco vibe coordinates with a sheer lace top. What!?!?¬†Then we’ve added the eighties power-suit necklace and I’m utterly confused.

Advertisements

Permalink Leave a Comment

Irony

October 17, 2008 at 9:51 am (Elizabeth Hurley, Ruffles) (, , , , , , )

Perhaps it can be considered *ironic* that Elizabeth Hurley channeled Pamela Anderson for a recent breast cancer awareness event. But the purpose of this Giambattista Valli dress seems be merely be breast awareness.

So, yes, Elizabeth Hurley does have breasts. And the poor girls are being elevated, smooshed together, and all-together strangled in a most uncomfortable way.

Ms. Hurley is exceptionally beautiful. But she really should dress in a more age-appropriate fashion. And why does that thing in her hand (a handbag?) look like the a bomb detonator?

Permalink Leave a Comment